CESTAT Remands Case for Non-Compliance with Section 35F, Appellant Granted Stay The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to non-compliance with Section 35F. The appellant was granted ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Remands Case for Non-Compliance with Section 35F, Appellant Granted Stay
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to non-compliance with Section 35F. The appellant was granted the chance to file a stay petition, and the challenged order was overturned.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with Section 35F. The appellant was given the opportunity to file a stay petition. The impugned order was set aside.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.