Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction for consideration of the refund claim with upto-date interest, and whether the refund was to be adjusted against any liability arising on finalisation of the pending assessment.
Analysis: The writ petition concerned inaction on a refund representation relating to excess KVAT paid. The pending assessment for the relevant year was relevant because any amount found due from the petitioner on finalisation of that assessment had to be set off against the refundable amount. The Court directed consideration of the representation within a fixed time and required computation of the refund together with upto-date interest under Section 89 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, so that only the balance, after lawful deduction of dues under the pending assessment, would be released.
Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded to the extent of obtaining a direction for timely consideration of the refund claim and computation of refund with interest, subject to adjustment of dues, with the balance refundable thereafter.