TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Income Tax Appeal Dismissed: Court Rejects Limitation Period Argument Due to Lack of Factual Basis in Reopening Case.</h1> <h3>Sh. Kamaruddin Mansori S/o Sh. Mohmmad Usman Mansori Versus Income Tax Officer, Jhalawar</h3> Sh. Kamaruddin Mansori S/o Sh. Mohmmad Usman Mansori Versus Income Tax Officer, Jhalawar - [2024] 470 ITR 570 (Raj) Issues Involved:The judgment deals with the issue of the validity of reopening a case under section 147 of the Income Tax Act after the statutory limitation period of 4 years.Validity of Reopening Case under Section 147:The appellant raised the question of whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in reopening the case after a period of 7 years, which exceeds the statutory provision of 4 years for reassessment. The appellant argued that the issue of limitation was specifically raised before the Tribunal but was not examined. It was contended that the date of dispatch of the notice under Section 148, not the date mentioned on the notice, should be considered. The appellant cited a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat to support their contention. However, the court noted that there was no factual foundation in the record to support the claim that the notice was dispatched after the date mentioned on it. Without such factual basis, the argument on the issue of limitation was deemed unsubstantiated. The court held that since there was no factual foundation, the substantial question of law could not be considered, leading to the dismissal of the income tax appeal. Conclusion:The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal as the argument regarding the limitation period for reopening the case under section 147 lacked a factual foundation. The court emphasized the importance of establishing a factual basis for legal arguments to be considered. Any pending applications were also disposed of in light of the dismissal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 