Petitions Dismissed: Trial to Proceed on Cheque Dishonor Case Involving Partial Loan Repayment Under NI Act.

The HC dismissed the petitions seeking to quash complaints and summoning orders under Sec. 138 of the NI Act for cheque dishonor totaling Rs. 25 lacs. The court found the respondent's argument, suggesting the cheques were partial repayment of an unsecured loan, more persuasive. It ruled that the case's merits should be evaluated during trial, permitting the petitioners to present their defenses at that stage. The court upheld the complaints and summoning orders, refraining from commenting on the case's merits, thereby allowing the trial process to proceed.

---

---

Issues: Quashing of complaints and summoning orders under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of cheques amounting to Rs. 25 lacs.

Analysis:
- The judgment involves three petitions seeking the quashing of complaints and summoning orders related to the dishonor of cheques worth Rs. 25 lacs each. The petitions were heard together and disposed of by a common order.

- The petitioner argued that the cheques were issued for purchasing shares, which were never transferred to them. They relied on a Supreme Court decision to support their plea for quashing the complaints and summoning orders.

- In contrast, the respondent contended that the cheques were part payment for an unsecured loan given to the accused company. They referred to an email and financial statements to justify proceeding with the complaints.

- After considering the arguments, complaints, summoning order, and the cited decision, the court found that the respondent's counsel's stance was more convincing. The court opined that the merits of the case should be determined during trial and that there was no ground to quash the complaints or summoning orders at this stage.

- Consequently, the petitions were disposed of, allowing the petitioners to raise their arguments in the trial court at the appropriate time. The court refrained from commenting on the case's merits while upholding the summoning of the petitioners based on the complaints and agreement between the parties.

---