Tribunal Reserves Judgment in Case 302/2021; Dismisses Case 8/2022 as Withdrawn by Appellant/Liquidator Without Costs.

In Comp. App (AT) (CH) (INS.) No. 302 / 2021, the Tribunal reserved judgment after hearing arguments from counsels for respondents R2 to R9, with R8 adopting the arguments of R2 to R6. In Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.8 / 2022, the Tribunal granted permission for the Appellant/Liquidator to withdraw the case, dismissing it as withdrawn without costs. The pending application for impleadment was also closed without costs.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment include arguments presented by counsels for respondents, adoption of arguments by another counsel, completion of hearing, submission of notes of submissions by counsels, permission to withdraw a case, and closure of a pending application for impleadment.

Comp. App (AT) (CH) (INS.) No. 302 / 2021:
In Comp. App (AT) (CH) (INS.) No. 302 / 2021, the counsels for respondents R2 to R6, R7, R8, and R9 presented arguments before the Tribunal. Counsel for R8 adopted the arguments of the counsels for R2 to R6. The hearing was completed, and the judgment was reserved. Additionally, Mr. V. Venkata Sivakumar appeared in person for an application in the same case. The Tribunal directed the counsels to file their notes of submissions before a specified date.

Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.8 / 2022:
In Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.8 / 2022, counsel for the Appellant / Liquidator sought permission to withdraw the case, which was granted. The Tribunal dismissed the case as withdrawn without imposing any costs. The counsel was permitted to file a memo for the withdrawal, and if filed, it would become part of the appeal material papers. The pending application for impleadment was closed without costs.

---