Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the special treatment accorded to women under the bail provisions was inconsistent with Article 15 of the Constitution of India; (ii) whether the petitioner, a woman accused of an offence punishable with death, was entitled to be released on bail under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Issue (i): Whether the special treatment accorded to women under the bail provisions was inconsistent with Article 15 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds only of sex, but Article 15(3) expressly permits the State to make special provisions for women and children. A provision that extends special consideration to women in the matter of bail is therefore within the constitutional exception and cannot be treated as repugnant to Article 15.
Conclusion: The special provision for women in the bail law was held to be constitutionally valid and not inconsistent with Article 15 of the Constitution of India.
Issue (ii): Whether the petitioner, a woman accused of an offence punishable with death, was entitled to be released on bail under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Analysis: Section 497 permits release on bail in non-bailable offences and specifically allows bail to a woman, even where the accusation is of an offence punishable with death or transportation for life. Section 498 confers a wider discretion in bail matters, and the circumstances of the case were considered sufficient to justify release on heavy bail to secure appearance at trial.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to bail and was directed to be released on furnishing personal bond and sureties.
Final Conclusion: The bail application was allowed, the constitutional objection to the special treatment of women was rejected, and the petitioner was ordered to be released pending trial.
Ratio Decidendi: Article 15(3) permits special statutory provisions in favour of women and children, and such a provision may validly be applied in bail matters to release a woman accused of a serious offence on appropriate conditions.