Respondents to review petitioner's claim based on advisory. Case adjourned for further hearing. The High Court of Bombay heard a case where the respondents agreed to review the petitioner's claim based on an advisory from the Directorate General of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Respondents to review petitioner's claim based on advisory. Case adjourned for further hearing.
The High Court of Bombay heard a case where the respondents agreed to review the petitioner's claim based on an advisory from the Directorate General of Systems and Data Management. The case was adjourned for further hearing on 2 May 2023.
The High Court of Bombay heard a case with citation 2023 (4) TMI 1221. Justices Nitin Jamdar and Abhay Ahuja presided. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Mr. Rishabh Jain. The respondents were represented by Mrs. Shehnaz V. Bharucha, Carina Xavier, Mr. Vikas Salgia, and Ms. Sangeeta Yadav. The court noted an advisory from the Directorate General of Systems and Data Management dated 11 April 2020. The respondents will review the petitioner's claim based on this advisory and report back to the court. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 2 May 2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
