TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Karnataka HC dismisses petition for SVLDR benefits, citing Apex Court ruling. Petitions denied for lack of merit.</h1> <h3>M/s. J SOURCING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. and Others Versus M/s. KEN COMPUTEK PVT. LTD. and Others</h3> The Karnataka HC dismissed petitioners' request for benefits under the SVLDR scheme, referring to an Apex Court judgment. Petitions were dismissed for ... Grant of benefit under the SVLDR scheme by extending the period - HELD THAT:- The request of the petitioners to issue directions to the 1st respondent to grant them the benefit under the SVLDR scheme cannot be granted by extending the period, is no longer res integra in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/S. YASHI CONSTRUCTIONS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [2022 (3) TMI 110 - SC ORDER]. There are no merit in the petitions and the same are hereby dismissed. The Karnataka High Court dismissed the petitioners' request for directions to grant them benefits under the SVLDR scheme, citing a judgment of the Apex Court. The petitions were dismissed as they lacked merit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
