Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal, filed beyond the permissible period of delay under the insolvency appellate limitation regime, was maintainable.
Analysis: The delay in filing the appeal exceeded the outer limit that could be condoned under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Since the statute restricts condonation only up to the prescribed additional period, no relief could be granted in an appeal filed beyond that limit. A separate prayer to intervene in another pending appeal was allowed.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable on limitation grounds and was dismissed. The request to intervene in the connected appeal was allowed.