Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal should invoke its inherent powers under Rule 41 to permit the seized optical fibre stock to be supplied as deemed exports instead of being physically exported.
Analysis: The earlier directions and the High Court's order were read as permitting export only in the sense of actual export out of India, and the request for deemed export amounted to seeking a new relief not sought in the main proceedings. The Court also noted that the High Court had already declined to treat the matter as requiring clarification or modification, and that a substantial part of the stock had in fact been physically exported, with no satisfactory basis shown for treating further physical export as impossible. On that footing, no exceptional ground was made out to use the Tribunal's inherent procedural power to alter the operative effect of the earlier directions.
Conclusion: The request for permission to effect deemed exports was rejected, and the application failed.