TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in view of the restriction under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 when commercial quantity of narcotic was seized from his possession.
Analysis: The seizure of commercial quantity attracted the stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act. On the facts stated, the petitioner was found unable to satisfy the threshold required to overcome the statutory restriction under Section 37.
Conclusion: Bail was rejected, as the petitioner could not overcome the bar under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
TaxTMI 
