Tribunal Revives Appeal for Hearing on Merits after Dismissal, Parties Agree on Date The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application, recalling the order dismissing the appeal due to the tax effect being less than the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Revives Appeal for Hearing on Merits after Dismissal, Parties Agree on Date
The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application, recalling the order dismissing the appeal due to the tax effect being less than the specified limit. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on merit as the tax effect fell under an exception clause of a CBDT Circular, allowing revival despite the initial dismissal. The Authorized Representative for the assessee agreed to contest the appeal on merit, leading to the order being recalled and the appeal set for a hearing on 31.03.2022, with both parties consenting to the date without further notice.
Issues: 1. Rectification of order based on monetary limit of tax effect. 2. Validity of reopening assessment based on revenue audit objection. 3. Reconsideration of appeal on merit.
Analysis: 1. The Miscellaneous Application (MA) was filed by the Revenue seeking rectification of the order dated 15.04.2021 passed in ITA No.27/SRT/2017. The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the tax effect being less than 50 lakhs as fixed by CBDT in Circular No.17 of 2019. However, the Revenue had the opportunity to revive the appeal if covered by the exception clause of CBDT Circular dated 20.08.2018. The tax effect in the present appeal was Rs.35,25,971, falling under the exception clause of CBDT Circular No.3/2018 as the reopening of assessment was based on a revenue audit objection.
2. The Authorized Representative for the assessee argued that reopening the assessment based on an audit objection was invalid, citing decisions by the Jurisdictional High Court. However, the reasons recorded did not disclose the reopening was based on the audit objection. Despite the controversy over whether the case was covered by the exception clause of the CBDT Circular, the Authorized Representative was willing to contest the appeal on merit. Consequently, the order dated 15.04.2021 was recalled, and the appeal was scheduled for a hearing on merit on 31.03.2022, with both parties consenting to the date without the need for a separate notice.
3. Considering the readiness of the Authorized Representative for the assessee to argue the appeal on merit, the Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the Revenue, recalling the previous order and fixing the appeal for a hearing on merit. The order was pronounced on 15 February 2022, and the result was placed on the notice board.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.