Supreme Court dismisses case despite delay condonation; Respondent's absence key The Supreme Court dismissed the case in 2009 (4) TMI 1052 - SC Order, despite condoning the delay, as the Respondent was not represented. - TMI
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses case despite delay condonation; Respondent's absence key
The Supreme Court dismissed the case in 2009 (4) TMI 1052 - SC Order, despite condoning the delay, as the Respondent was not represented.
The Supreme Court's judgment in 2009 (4) TMI 1052 - SC Order was delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM. The Petitioner was represented by Mr. Mohan Parasaran, ASG., Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv., Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. The Respondent did not have representation. The court condoned the delay and dismissed the case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.