Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sentence of the convicted appellants was liable to be suspended under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The application for suspension of sentence was not pressed for one appellant and was therefore dismissed to that extent. As regards the remaining appellants, the Court took note of the facts and circumstances of the case, including the fact that they had been on bail during trial, and found it appropriate to suspend the substantive sentence pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The sentence was suspended for the remaining appellants and they were directed to be released on bail subject to conditions, while the application stood dismissed as not pressed for one appellant.