Adjournment Denied: Respondent's Counsel Unavailable, Money Dispute, Next Hearing Set The Delhi High Court denied the adjournment request by Respondent No. 1 due to counsel unavailability. The respondent initially declined money offered by ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Adjournment Denied: Respondent's Counsel Unavailable, Money Dispute, Next Hearing Set
The Delhi High Court denied the adjournment request by Respondent No. 1 due to counsel unavailability. The respondent initially declined money offered by the petitioner but later accepted half under protest. The next hearing was scheduled for February 16, 2016.
The Delhi High Court judgment involved an adjournment request by Respondent No. 1 due to his counsel's unavailability. The petitioner offered money to the respondent, who initially declined but later agreed to accept half of the amount under protest. The court scheduled the next hearing for February 16, 2016.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.