TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused and the surrounding circumstances.
Analysis: The applicant relied on the fact that a co-accused had already been granted bail and that his case stood on the same footing. The prosecution did not controvert the parity submission. The applicant had been in custody since 05.10.2010 and no previous criminal history was stated. On these facts, the Court found it fit to grant bail.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the applicant.
TaxTMI 
