We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Tribunal permits belated claims under IBC, directs Liquidator actions. Ex-parte order challenged. The Tribunal allowed the urgent hearing request in IA No. 433/2020, permitting the admission of belated claims under Section 60(5) of IBC. The Liquidator ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal permits belated claims under IBC, directs Liquidator actions. Ex-parte order challenged.
The Tribunal allowed the urgent hearing request in IA No. 433/2020, permitting the admission of belated claims under Section 60(5) of IBC. The Liquidator was directed to implead claimants, modify the stakeholders' list, and provide reasons for the delayed claims within specified timelines. Additionally, an application to set aside an ex-parte order was filed, leading to the issuance of notices, filing of affidavits, and scheduling a hearing in conjunction with the initial order.
Issues: Urgent hearing of IA No. 433/2020, Admission of belated claims, Setting aside ex-parte order
Issue 1: Urgent hearing of IA No. 433/2020 The Tribunal allowed IA No. 432/2020 seeking urgent hearing of IA No. 433/2020. The applicant was represented by Ms. Salina Chalana, Mr. Manish Jain, and Ms. Divya Sharma, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Mr. D.K. Singal, and Mr. Rabinder Singh Bhatia. The Liquidator, represented by Mr. G.S. Sarin, sought admission of claims filed after the submission deadline and requested modification of the stakeholders' list.
Issue 2: Admission of belated claims The Liquidator filed IA No. 433/2020 under Section 60(5) of IBC seeking admission of claims submitted after the deadline. The Tribunal directed the applicant to implead the belated claimants and file an amended memo of parties within a week. Notices were to be issued to the respondents for a specified date, and the impleaded parties were given a chance to respond within two weeks. The applicant was required to provide reasons for the delay in filing claims within two weeks.
Issue 3: Setting aside ex-parte order Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed IA No. 555/2020 to set aside the ex-parte order dated 09.09.2020 passed in IA No. 368/2020. The Tribunal, after hearing Mr. Manish Jain for the applicant, directed the issuance of notices to respondents for a specific date. The applicant was instructed to file an affidavit of service supported by acknowledgment of receipt of notices within a week. Replies were to be filed within a week after receiving the notice, and the IA was listed for a hearing along with IA No. 368/2020 on the specified date.
This detailed analysis covers the urgent hearing request, admission of belated claims, and the application to set aside an ex-parte order as per the Tribunal's instructions and legal procedures.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.