Successive bail applications require fresh grounds or changed circumstances; bail was refused where no new basis was shown.

A successive bail application is maintainable only if the applicant demonstrates fresh grounds or a material change in circumstances after the earlier rejection or withdrawal. Here, the earlier bail plea had been withdrawn after filing of the charge-sheet, and the later application was also filed after the charge-sheet without any new circumstance shown. On those facts, no different view was justified, and regular bail was refused for want of maintainability and absence of fresh grounds.

---

---

Issues: Whether the successive bail application was maintainable in the absence of any change in circumstances.

Analysis: A successive application for bail can be entertained only if the applicant shows fresh grounds or a change in circumstances after the earlier rejection or withdrawal. In the present matter, the earlier bail application had been withdrawn after filing of the charge-sheet, and the present application was also filed after filing of the charge-sheet. No fresh circumstances were demonstrated to justify a different view.

Conclusion: The application for regular bail was not maintainable on the facts shown, and no ground for grant of bail was made out.

Final Conclusion: The request for bail was rejected for want of any change in circumstances or fresh grounds.

Ratio Decidendi: A successive bail application must disclose fresh grounds or changed circumstances to warrant a different decision from the earlier application.

---