Tribunal Upholds Dismissal of Revenue's Appeal on Deduction Disallowance; CBDT Circular Key

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the deletion of disallowance of deduction u/s.54F due to the low tax effect falling below Rs. 20 lakhs, as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018. The Circular restricts appeals where tax effect is below the threshold, emphasizing strict compliance and providing the option for the Department to seek a recall under specified circumstances. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to the Circular's provisions and ensuring alignment with prescribed criteria for maintaining appeals before the Tribunal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of deduction u/s.54F of Rs. 73,94,404 made by the AO.
2. Applicability and maintainability of the appeal filed by the Revenue in view of recent CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 restricting the filing of appeals where the tax effect is below Rs. 20 lakhs.

Analysis:
1. The judgment pertains to the Revenue's appeal for A.Y. 2013-14 challenging the deletion of disallowance of deduction u/s.54F of Rs. 73,94,404 made by the AO. The Tribunal noted that the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 restricts the filing of appeals by the Revenue where the tax effect is below Rs. 20 lakhs. The Revenue's appeal was filed on 10/03/2017, and the Circular was issued on 11/07/2018 with retrospective effect. The Tribunal found that the tax effect in this case was less than Rs. 20 lakhs, and the Revenue's case did not fall within the exceptions provided in the Circular. As a result, in accordance with the Circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to the low tax effect.

2. The Tribunal raised a query regarding the applicability and maintainability of the Revenue's appeal in light of the CBDT Circular. The Revenue did not dispute the query and left the decision to the Tribunal. The Tribunal observed that the Circular prohibits subordinate authorities from filing appeals where the tax effect is below Rs. 20 lakhs, even for pending appeals. It was emphasized that if upon re-verification the tax effect is more, or if the Revenue's case falls within the exceptions provided in the Circular, the Department can approach the Tribunal for a recall of the order within the prescribed time period under the Act. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed based on the low tax effect, with the option for the Department to seek a recall under specified circumstances.

3. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to the CBDT Circular regarding the filing of appeals based on the tax effect threshold. It underscores the need for strict compliance with the Circular's provisions and the implications of not meeting the prescribed criteria for maintaining appeals before the Tribunal. The decision serves as a reminder for Revenue authorities to assess the tax effect before pursuing appeals to ensure alignment with the Circular's guidelines and exceptions.

---