TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court denies plaintiff's reply time request in plaint rejection case under Order VII Rule 11 - further arguments set.</h1> <h3>ICP INVESTMENTS (MAURITIUS) LTD. Versus UPPAL HOUSING PVT. LTD. & ORS</h3> ICP INVESTMENTS (MAURITIUS) LTD. Versus UPPAL HOUSING PVT. LTD. & ORS - TMI The Delhi High Court, in a case involving rejection of plaint, noted that the defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC. The plaintiff's counsel requested time to file a reply, but the court clarified that the application would be decided based on the plaint and documents already filed. The case was adjourned to 15th May, 2019 for further arguments.
TaxTMI 