Supreme Court India grants leave in case 2012 (3) TMI 677 with no stay. Justices Patnaik and Kumar presided. The Supreme Court of India expedited the hearing and granted leave in the case, as per the citation 2012 (3) TMI 677. Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court India grants leave in case 2012 (3) TMI 677 with no stay. Justices Patnaik and Kumar presided.
The Supreme Court of India expedited the hearing and granted leave in the case, as per the citation 2012 (3) TMI 677. Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar presided over the matter. The Court did not grant a stay. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Preetesh Kapur, Mr. Ashok Kulkarni, Mr. Abhay A. Jena, Ms. Bina Gupta, and Ms. Radhika Mathur, while the respondent was represented by Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Mr.
The Supreme Court granted leave to the petitioner and directed that the matter be heard on an expedited basis. The Court expressly ordered "Hearing expedited" and declined to grant interim relief, recording "No stay." The pronouncement is procedural: admission of the petition for consideration, prioritization of hearing, and refusal to suspend the operation of impugned orders or proceedings pending final disposal. No substantive adjudication on merit appears in the order; the Court's directions are confined to interlocutory disposition permitting prompt judicial determination without altering the status quo by way of stay.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
