TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court allows exemption application with conditions, remits VAT levy issue, condones appeal delay, emphasizes penalty reassessment.</h1> The court allowed the exemption application subject to conditions and remitted the issue of VAT levy on repossessed cars to the adjudicating authority for ... Levy of VAT - sale of repossessed cars by assessee/Bank - penalty - HELD THAT:- In identical circumstances this court in its judgment reported as Citi Bank vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax [2015 (12) TMI 1040 - DELHI HIGH COURT] had ruled against the assessee. In the present case, levy of penalty is above 150%. The main question of law is answered against the assessee. Appeal allowed in part. Issues involved:1. Delay in re-filing the appeal2. Exemption application3. VAT levy on the sale of repossessed cars4. Proportionality of penalty imposedAnalysis:1. Delay in re-filing the appeal:The judgment begins by addressing the delay in re-filing the appeal, which is condoned for reasons mentioned in the application. The court disposes of the application, indicating that the delay issue has been resolved.2. Exemption application:An exemption application is allowed subject to just exceptions. The court disposes of this application as well, indicating that the exemption has been granted with certain conditions.3. VAT levy on the sale of repossessed cars:The main issue in the appeal is whether the assessee/bank's sale of repossessed cars is subject to VAT levy. The VAT Tribunal had ruled in favor of the levy, citing precedents such as the Citi Bank case and HDFC Bank case. The court notes that while the main question of law is answered against the assessee, it remits the matter to the adjudicating authority to determine the proportionality of the penalty imposed, considering the debatable nature of the issue. The appeal is partly allowed on this basis.4. Proportionality of penalty imposed:The court highlights that in the present case, the penalty imposed is above 150%, similar to the HDFC Bank case where a 200% penalty was deemed unjustified. The court emphasizes the need for the adjudicating authority to reassess the penalty in light of the debatable nature of the issue, indicating that the appeal is allowed to a certain extent based on this consideration.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
