Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on Section 11 Benefits for Assessee

The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, allowing the benefit of Section 11(1)(a) & 11(2) of the Act to the assessee for Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2012-13. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in decisions across assessment years and cited legal precedents, ultimately dismissing both appeals of the Revenue. The order was pronounced on 25/10/2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Appeal against separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) regarding Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2012-13.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Benefit of Section 11(1)(a) & 11(2) of the Act

The Revenue contended that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing the benefit of Section 11(1)(a) & 11(2) of the Act, contrary to Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) of the Act. The AO observed that the assessee, an AOP trust providing vocational training, charged fees, falling under "the advancement of any other object of general utility." The AO sought clarification, disallowing the exemption under Section 11(1)(a)/11(2) of the Act. The assessee argued that its activities were educational and charitable, eligible for exemptions. Ld. CIT(A) deleted the additions, citing compliance with Section 11(2) and registration under Section 12AA. The Tribunal noted finality of the Ld. CIT(A)'s order for AY 2011-12, applying principles of consistency and citing the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT Vs. Excel Industries Limited. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision.

Issue 2: Identical Issues in AY 2012-13

The issues raised by the Revenue for AY 2012-13 were identical to those for AY 2009-10. Both parties agreed to apply the decision made for AY 2009-10 to AY 2012-13. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for AY 2012-13 based on the decision for AY 2009-10.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, allowing the benefit of Section 11(1)(a) & 11(2) of the Act to the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in decisions across assessment years and cited relevant legal precedents to support its judgment. Both appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 25/10/2018.

---