Case adjourned to 25.07.2016 for both parties' absence, plaintiff counsel requests time for legal preparation. The case was adjourned to 25.07.2016 due to the absence of both parties, with the counsel for the plaintiff seeking additional time to present relevant ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Case adjourned to 25.07.2016 for both parties' absence, plaintiff counsel requests time for legal preparation.
The case was adjourned to 25.07.2016 due to the absence of both parties, with the counsel for the plaintiff seeking additional time to present relevant law.
The Delhi High Court case involved Dr. Satinder Kumar Gautam as the Joint Registrar (Judicial). Both the Appellant and Respondent were absent. The counsel for the plaintiff requested more time to bring relevant law. The case was adjourned to 25.07.2016.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.