We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Appeal partially allowed: Corrected business loss, depreciation set-off granted; claim for rental income depreciation denied. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing correction of carried forward business loss and allowing set off of unabsorbed depreciation against ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal partially allowed: Corrected business loss, depreciation set-off granted; claim for rental income depreciation denied.
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing correction of carried forward business loss and allowing set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income under any head. The claim for depreciation against rental income was dismissed. The order was pronounced on August 5, 2013, at Chennai.
Issues involved: Appeal against order of ld. CIT(A)-VIII, Chennai regarding carried forward business loss, set off of unabsorbed depreciation, and disallowance of claim for depreciation.
Carried Forward Business Loss: Assessee appealed for correction of carried forward business loss amount. Assessing Officer directed to verify and adopt correct figure of carried forward business loss, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.
Set Off of Unabsorbed Depreciation: Assessee claimed set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income from house property. Ld. CIT(A) erred in not allowing the set off. Assessee relied on Supreme Court decision and amendment to section 32(2) by Finance Act, 2001. Tribunal held in favor of assessee based on the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, allowing set off against income under any head without limit.
Disallowance of Claim for Depreciation: Disallowance of claim for depreciation of &8377; 1,81,174/- upheld as income from rent is chargeable under 'income from house property' and depreciation cannot be claimed against the same property.
Conclusion: Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing correction of carried forward business loss and allowing set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income under any head. Dismissed the claim for depreciation against rental income. The order was pronounced on August 5, 2013, at Chennai.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
