Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Corporate Debtor should be ordered into liquidation under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 after the Committee of Creditors approved liquidation and no viable resolution plan was available.
Analysis: The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process had run its course, the Committee of Creditors had considered the available resolution proposals, and no acceptable resolution plan emerged for approval. The Committee of Creditors had thereafter resolved, with the requisite majority, to recommend liquidation and to appoint the existing Resolution Professional as Liquidator. In these circumstances, the statutory prerequisites for liquidation under the insolvency framework stood satisfied, and there was no basis to defer the process further.
Conclusion: The Corporate Debtor was ordered to be liquidated and the Resolution Professional was appointed as Liquidator.