Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the National Book Trust is an "other authority" and therefore "State" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The earlier view treating the Trust as outside Article 12 rested on Chander Mohan Khanna, but that reasoning was later disapproved by the larger Bench decision in Pradeep Kumar Biswas. The applicable test is whether the body is financially, functionally and administratively dominated by, or under the pervasive control of, the Government. On the Trust's constitutive resolution and rules, the Court found that the Government appoints the Chairman and members, exercises control over funding, approval of regulations and amendments, receives annual reports and audited accounts, and retains pervasive administrative oversight at every stage. Mere autonomy or the presence of some non-governmental sources of funding does not negate State character where the overall control is deep and pervasive.
Conclusion: The National Book Trust is an "other authority" and hence "State" within Article 12; the contrary view was overruled and the impugned order was set aside with the matter remitted for decision on merits.