We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal on NCERT's State Classification under Article 12 The appeal challenging the classification of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) as 'State' under Article 12 of the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal on NCERT's State Classification under Article 12
The appeal challenging the classification of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) as "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. The Court held that NCERT, despite its assistance to the Ministry of Education and some government control over grant utilization, does not meet the criteria to be considered an instrumentality or agency of the Government. The Court emphasized that not every autonomous body with ties to the Government falls under Article 12, citing factors such as powers, functions, and control in its decision.
Issues involved: Whether the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) is "State" as defined under Article 12 of the Constitution.
Summary: The appellant, an employee of NCERT, challenged the termination of his services by moving the Delhi High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. NCERT objected to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, claiming it is not an instrumentality or authority under Article 12. The High Court upheld the objection, leading to the appeal.
In determining if a body is an instrumentality or agency of the Government, factors such as powers, functions, finances, and control are considered. State assistance, share capital, monopoly status, and State control are indicative factors. However, Article 12 should not be broadly interpreted to include every autonomous body with a nexus to the Government.
The NCERT, a registered society, assists the Ministry of Education in implementing educational policies. Its activities include research, training, and publication of educational materials. The Executive Committee, comprising government officials and educationists, manages its affairs. While the Government controls grant utilization, NCERT is largely autonomous.
Comparisons were drawn to previous cases like ICPS and CSIR to determine if NCERT qualifies as "State" under Article 12. The Court found NCERT does not meet the criteria for being classified as "State" and dismissed the appeal, concurring with the High Court's decision.
In conclusion, the appeal challenging NCERT's classification as "State" under Article 12 was dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.