Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2002 (1) TMI 1207 - SC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Karnataka High Court Decision Upheld: Mysore Paper Mills Qualifies as 'State' under Article 12 The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision that the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. qualifies as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Karnataka High Court Decision Upheld: Mysore Paper Mills Qualifies as 'State' under Article 12

                          The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision that the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. qualifies as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India due to its government control and public interest functions. The transfer order of the second respondent to Calcutta was deemed lawful and not influenced by mala fides. The Court dismissed the appeals without awarding costs.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. is 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
                          2. Whether the transfer order of the second respondent to Calcutta is vitiated by mala fides, arbitrary, and illegal.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Whether the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. is 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India:

                          The Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court reviewed various tests laid down by the Supreme Court to determine whether an entity qualifies as 'State' under Article 12. The Court considered the following factors:

                          - Government Company Status: The appellant-company is a government company as per Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          - Public Interest Functions: The company is entrusted with functions of public interest closely related to governmental functions and enjoys a monopoly status conferred by the State.
                          - Government Control: The Government operates behind a corporate veil, carrying out governmental functions of vital importance through the company.
                          - Financial Contribution: More than 97% of the share capital is contributed by the State of Karnataka and financial institutions controlled by the Government of India.
                          - Board of Directors: The business is managed by a Board of Directors, including nominees from the Government of Karnataka and financial institutions, with significant control over appointments and management.
                          - Administrative Control: The company is under the control of the Government of Karnataka, including financial controls, approvals for investments, and adherence to reservation policies.
                          - Government Guarantees: Loans taken by the company are guaranteed by the Government of Karnataka.
                          - Public Premises Notification: The company's premises are notified as 'public premises' under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1974.

                          Based on these factors, the Full Bench concluded that the appellant-company is an authority and instrumentality or agency of the State, thus falling within the definition of 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

                          2. Whether the transfer order of the second respondent to Calcutta is vitiated by mala fides, arbitrary, and illegal:

                          The Full Bench considered whether the transfer order dated 27-11-1997, transferring the second respondent to Calcutta, was vitiated by mala fides or extraneous considerations. The Court noted the following:

                          - Administrative Grounds: The transfer was made on administrative grounds, as per the terms and conditions of the contract of service and Officers Service Rules.
                          - Lack of Substantiation: The allegations of mala fides and vindictiveness were not substantiated by the respondents.
                          - Legal Right to Challenge: The respondents have no legal right to challenge the transfer order when the plea of mala fides and vindictiveness is not proven.

                          The Court found that the transfer order was not vitiated by mala fides or extraneous considerations and was in accordance with the administrative requirements of the appellant-company.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court. The Court confirmed that the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. is 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India due to its deep and pervasive control by the Government of Karnataka and its public interest functions. Additionally, the transfer order of the second respondent was found to be lawful and not vitiated by mala fides or extraneous considerations. The appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found