Challenged modifications in Resolution Plan: Appellant vs. Adjudicating Authority The Appellant, NBCC (India) Ltd., challenged modifications made by the Adjudicating Authority in the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Challenged modifications in Resolution Plan: Appellant vs. Adjudicating Authority
The Appellant, NBCC (India) Ltd., challenged modifications made by the Adjudicating Authority in the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors, arguing that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction. Notice was issued to Respondents for further proceedings. ICICI Bank Ltd., the Interim Resolution Professional, and IDBI Bank accepted notice for filing reply affidavits. Implementation of the Successful Resolution Plan involved NBCC (India) Ltd. and major Institutional Financial Creditors, with an Interim Monitoring Committee overseeing execution. Directions were given for the Resolution Professional's payment and outstanding fees, to be determined by the Committee of Creditors until the Appeal's disposal.
Issues: 1. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority to modify the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors. 2. Notice to the Respondents and filing of reply affidavits. 3. Appeal by the Resolution Professional regarding specific observations in the order. 4. Implementation of the Successful Resolution Plan involving the Successful Resolution Applicant and major Institutional Financial Creditors. 5. Constitution of an Interim Monitoring Committee. 6. Payment to the Resolution Professional and outstanding fees.
Analysis: 1. The Appellant, NBCC (India) Ltd., challenged modifications made by the Adjudicating Authority in the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors. The Appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by allowing objections of certain parties and directing payment to unclaimed Fixed Deposit Holders. The Appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority should not interfere with the business decisions of the Committee of Creditors, taken through prescribed voting shares. Notice was issued to the Respondents for further proceedings.
2. ICICI Bank Ltd., the Interim Resolution Professional, and IDBI Bank accepted notice, with a deadline set for filing reply affidavits. Further notice was to be served on other Respondents, with provisions for email service. An appeal was indicated by the Resolution Professional regarding specific observations in the order, to be addressed in due course.
3. The implementation of the Successful Resolution Plan involved the participation of the Successful Resolution Applicant, NBCC (India) Ltd., and major Institutional Financial Creditors. An Interim Monitoring Committee, including the Successful Resolution Applicant and the three major Institutional Financial Creditors, was to be constituted to oversee the plan's execution. The Resolution Professional was to continue managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, with payment to be determined by the Interim Monitoring Committee.
4. Directions were given for the Resolution Professional's payment for past services rendered during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, with outstanding fees to be settled as per the decision of the Committee of Creditors. These directions were to remain in effect until the disposal of the Appeal, with the matter listed for admission after notice on a specified date.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI OCR ✕
of 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
