Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Second appeal challenging possession delivery application dismissed for being timely under new Act. No costs ordered.</h1> The court dismissed the second appeal challenging the application for possession delivery, holding it was filed within the extended 90-day period after ... - The judgment interprets section 30(b) of the Limitation Act, 1963 in a case where the application for delivery of possession was challenged on the basis of the new Act reducing the time limit. The court held that the application was filed within the extended period of 90 days after the commencement of the new Act, making it timely. The second appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.