<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292232</link>
    <description>Section 30(b) of the Limitation Act, 1963 gave applications whose limitation period had been shortened by the new Act a 90-day saving period from commencement, and section 12(1) required the day of commencement to be excluded in computing that period. On that construction, an application for delivery of property filed on 1-4-1964 was within time, because the 90 days ran from the day after commencement. The application was therefore not barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:47:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292232</link>
      <description>Section 30(b) of the Limitation Act, 1963 gave applications whose limitation period had been shortened by the new Act a 90-day saving period from commencement, and section 12(1) required the day of commencement to be excluded in computing that period. On that construction, an application for delivery of property filed on 1-4-1964 was within time, because the 90 days ran from the day after commencement. The application was therefore not barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>