IBC Petition Dismissed: Operational Creditor Accepts Payment, Tribunal Rules Against

The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 by an Operational Creditor against a Corporate Debtor for default in services provided. The dismissal was due to the Petitioner accepting partial payment during the proceedings and still proceeding with the petition, contrary to established principles that creditors should not initiate IBC proceedings solely for recovery. The Tribunal ruled against the Petitioner, emphasizing their acceptance of payment and continuation of the petition despite the partial payment made by the Corporate Debtor.

---

---

Issues:
1. Filing of Petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 by Operational Creditor against Corporate Debtor for default in services provided.
2. Details of Petitioner Company, Corporate Debtor, and Interim Resolution Professional.
3. Transactions giving rise to operational debt and default amount claimed.
4. Response from Corporate Debtor disputing some invoices and partial payment made.
5. Acceptance of partial payment by Petitioner during proceedings and its impact on the petition.

Issue 1: Filing of Petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016
The Petition was filed by V-Con Telecom Towers (P) Ltd as an Operational Creditor against Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited for default in services provided. The Petition was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016) due to the alleged default arising in relation to the transactions of services provided to the Corporate Debtor.

Issue 2: Details of Parties and Interim Resolution Professional
The Petition contained details of the Petitioner Company and Corporate Debtor, including the date of incorporation and paid-up capital of the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Aakash Singhal was proposed as the Interim Resolution Professional in Part-III of the application.

Issue 3: Transactions and Default Amount
Part-IV of the Petition detailed the transactions giving rise to the operational debt, with the claimed default amount being Rs. 21,02,449. The amount was stated to remain outstanding from the issuance of the demand notice from 17.1.2019.

Issue 4: Response from Corporate Debtor
The Corporate Debtor, in its reply, admitted liability in relation to 22 Invoices but disputed 3 other Invoices. It was noted that a sum of Rs. 14,27,522 had been processed and passed by the Corporate Debtor, and disputes regarding payments to a group company of the Petitioner were raised. The Corporate Debtor contested the default under Section 5(20) of the IBC, 2016 and the classification of the Petitioner as an Operational Creditor.

Issue 5: Acceptance of Partial Payment
During the proceedings, the Corporate Debtor made a partial payment, which was accepted by the Petitioner. However, the Tribunal highlighted that accepting payment while the petition was pending contradicted established principles that creditors should not initiate IBC proceedings solely for recovery. The Tribunal dismissed the petition as the Petitioner chose to accept the payment and still proceeded with the petition, despite the partial payment made by the Corporate Debtor.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the petition without costs due to the Petitioner's acceptance of partial payment and subsequent decision to continue with the petition, contrary to the principles governing IBC proceedings.

---