Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2019 (12) TMI 1374 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants RP possession of Shed in CIRP case, upholding NCLT jurisdiction. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Resolution Professional/Liquidator, allowing them to take possession of the Shed from the Applicant. The decision ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal grants RP possession of Shed in CIRP case, upholding NCLT jurisdiction.

                            The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Resolution Professional/Liquidator, allowing them to take possession of the Shed from the Applicant. The decision upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), emphasizing the RP's duty to control assets owned by the Corporate Applicant. The Tribunal considered the impact of pending civil suits on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and concluded that the RP's claim for possession could proceed under the IBC due to the absence of restraint orders in the pending suits.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legality of the Applicant's occupation of the Shed.
                            2. Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) versus Civil Court.
                            3. Powers of the Resolution Professional (RP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
                            4. Impact of pending civil suits on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of the Applicant's occupation of the Shed:
                            The Applicant claimed that he was not in illegal occupation of the Shed, asserting his right based on an Agreement dated 28th January 1997, and his status as an erstwhile employee of the Corporate Applicant. The Applicant also mentioned a pending Special Suit No. 23 of 2009 for recovery of monies from the Corporate Applicant. Conversely, the Resolution Professional argued that the Applicant was in illegal occupation, citing Clause 7 of the Agreement which entitled the Petitioner to ask the Applicant to vacate the Shed within one month of notice. The Corporate Applicant had already filed Special Suit No. 21/2009/A seeking possession of the Shed.

                            2. Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) versus Civil Court:
                            The Tribunal emphasized that under Section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016, the NCLT has jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of any application or proceeding by or against the Corporate Applicant. This jurisdiction is exclusive, as further reinforced by Sections 63 and 231 of the Code, which bar the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters pertaining to the NCLT. The Tribunal cited the judgment in *Liberty House Group Pte Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.*, which confirmed that no civil court shall have jurisdiction over matters under the NCLT's domain.

                            3. Powers of the Resolution Professional (RP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016:
                            The Tribunal noted that the RP has the duty to take control and custody of any asset over which the Corporate Applicant has ownership rights, as per Section 18 of the IBC. This includes assets not in the possession of the Corporate Applicant. The Tribunal referred to the judgment in *Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India*, which clarified that the RP has no adjudicatory powers but must take control of assets subject to ownership determination by a court or authority. The Tribunal also referenced the *Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank* case, emphasizing the unified and exhaustive nature of the IBC.

                            4. Impact of pending civil suits on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):
                            The Tribunal acknowledged the pending suits: Special Suit No. 21/2009/A by the Corporate Applicant for possession of the Shed, and Special Suit No. 23 of 2009 by the Applicant for recovery of money. The Tribunal stated that the moratorium under the IBC temporarily stayed the suit filed by the Applicant, but the suit for recovery of possession by the Corporate Applicant would continue. The Tribunal concluded that the RP's claim for possession of the Shed could be entertained under the IBC, given the absence of restraint orders in the pending suits.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal directed that the Resolution Professional/Liquidator shall be allowed to take possession of the Shed from the Applicant, agreeing with the decision of the Member (Judicial). The application was disposed of accordingly, upholding the overriding powers of the IBC and the exclusive jurisdiction of the NCLT.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found