Bombay High Court Orders from Website Valid in Trial Courts, Circulation to Judges Ensured

The judgment affirms the validity and reliability of orders from the official website of the Bombay High Court as credible evidence in trial courts. It clarifies that printouts from the website hold sanctity and can be considered by trial courts, with the option for counter verification to confirm authenticity. The court directs the circulation of this decision to Principal District Judges in Maharashtra to ensure the acceptance of online orders in judicial proceedings. The matter is adjourned with the continuation of interim relief and grants the applicant liberty to seek the recalling of a previous order for further legal actions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of orders from the official website of the Bombay High Court versus certified copies in trial courts.
2. Reliability of printouts from the official website as evidence in trial courts.
3. Judicial practice regarding acceptance of printouts versus certified copies in trial courts.
4. Direction to circulate the judgment to all Principal District Judges in Maharashtra.
5. Interim relief continuation and liberty to seek recalling of a previous order.

Analysis:

1. The judgment addresses the concern raised by the applicant's counsel regarding the validity of orders from the official website of the Bombay High Court in comparison to certified copies when presented in trial courts. The judge clarifies that printouts from the official website hold sanctity and trial courts should consider them, with the possibility of counter verification to confirm their authenticity.

2. The judge emphasizes that printouts from the official website are reliable documents for trial courts to consider, and any doubt regarding their authenticity can be resolved by checking the official website. This ensures that orders available online are deemed credible and admissible as evidence in court proceedings.

3. The judgment highlights the common issue where trial judges may prefer certified copies over printouts from the official website. The judge directs the Registrar (Judicial) to circulate the order to all Principal District Judges in Maharashtra to inform them about the reliability of orders from the official website and the need to consider them as valid documents in judicial proceedings.

4. The judgment adjourns the matter to a later date while maintaining the interim relief granted previously. Additionally, it grants the applicant the liberty to file an application to recall a previous 'No evidence' order issued by a Civil Judge, allowing for further legal actions based on the court's decision.

In conclusion, the judgment establishes the credibility of orders from the official website of the Bombay High Court, emphasizes their reliability as evidence in trial courts, addresses the judicial practice concerning the acceptance of online printouts, and issues a directive to inform all Principal District Judges in Maharashtra about the same.

---