Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2019 (11) TMI 1468 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        NCLAT approves CoC's resolution to replace IRP with new RP, directs CoC to clear dues promptly The National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) approved the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) resolution to replace the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              NCLAT approves CoC's resolution to replace IRP with new RP, directs CoC to clear dues promptly

                              The National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) approved the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) resolution to replace the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with a new Resolution Professional (RP), Mr. Mangesh V. Kekre. The CoC was directed to clear the IRP's dues promptly, and any fee disputes were to be borne by the Operational Creditor. The NCLAT upheld the Tribunal's order, allowing the appointment of the new RP to manage the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process effectively.




                              Issues:
                              1. Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) by Committee of Creditors (CoC) under Section 22(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I & B Code).
                              2. Dispute over the remuneration of the IRP leading to delay in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
                              3. Contempt application filed by the IRP for non-payment of fees.
                              4. Legal implications and directions provided by the National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) regarding the payment of dues to the IRP.
                              5. Appointment of a new Resolution Professional by the CoC.

                              Issue 1: Replacement of IRP by CoC
                              The CoC, with a 100% majority, passed a resolution seeking the replacement of the present IRP with a new RP, Mr. Mangesh V. Kekre. The retiring IRP did not object to his replacement, citing a previous NCLAT order directing the CoC to clear his dues. The CoC was directed to make the payment within two weeks. The Tribunal found no adverse information to oppose the approval of the CoC's resolution, thus allowing the replacement of the IRP.

                              Issue 2: Dispute over IRP's Remuneration
                              The CoC filed an IA stating that the IRP demanded a high fee which was not agreeable. The CoC offered a lower remuneration, leading to a delay in the process. The Tribunal directed the CoC to clear the IRP's dues without delay and recommended the replacement of the IRP with Mr. Mangesh V. Kekre. The Tribunal emphasized that any difference in fees should be borne by the Operational Creditor, not the CoC.

                              Issue 3: Contempt Application by IRP
                              The IRP filed a contempt application for non-payment of fees against the Committee of Creditors. The Tribunal directed the matter to be transferred to the Co-ordinate Bench for proper consideration and necessary orders.

                              Issue 4: NCLAT Directions
                              The NCLAT upheld the Tribunal's order directing the CoC to clear the dues of the IRP, emphasizing that the CoC must determine the dues in accordance with the law. The NCLAT did not interfere with the Tribunal's order, leading to the approval of the CoC's resolution for appointing a new RP.

                              Issue 5: Appointment of New Resolution Professional
                              The CoC recommended the appointment of Mr. Mangesh V. Kekre as the new Resolution Professional to manage the affairs of the Corporate Debtor and proceed with the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The IA filed by the CoC for this purpose was admitted, and Mr. Kekre was appointed as the Resolution Professional.

                              In conclusion, the judgment addressed various issues related to the replacement of the IRP, disputes over remuneration, NCLAT directions, and the appointment of a new Resolution Professional, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and facilitating the progress of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found