Corporate Insolvency Application Admitted Against Shubhkamna Buildtech Pvt Ltd: Moratorium Imposed

The National Company Law Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency against M/s Shubhkamna Buildtech Private Limited, imposing a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. An Interim Resolution Professional, Ms. Gurkamal Hora Arora, was appointed to oversee the resolution process, ensuring compliance with the relevant provisions of the Code. The Tribunal communicated the order to all parties involved and forwarded a copy to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India for record-keeping.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Process under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 against a specific company.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background and Parties Involved:
The Applicant, M/s Concord Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., sought to initiate Corporate Insolvency process against M/s Shubhkamna Buildtech Private Limited, the Respondent. The Applicant was engaged as a contractor for a residential project by the Respondent.

2. Debt and Default:
The Applicant claimed a total debt of Rs. 2,71,71,296/- from the Respondent, backed by various invoices and agreements. Despite repeated requests and notices, the Respondent failed to pay the outstanding amount, leading to the initiation of the insolvency process.

3. Legal Proceedings:
After issuing a notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Applicant filed an application before the National Company Law Tribunal. The Corporate Debtor failed to respond or appear, resulting in an ex-parte proceeding.

4. Admission of Application:
The Tribunal found the application complete, establishing the default in payment beyond doubt. The Applicant fulfilled all requirements under Section 9(5) of the Code, leading to the admission of the application.

5. Consequences of Admission:
Upon admission, a moratorium was imposed on the Corporate Debtor as per Section 14(1) of the IBC, 2016. This prohibited various actions against the Debtor, ensuring protection during the insolvency resolution process.

6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional:
The Operational Creditor proposed the name of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) - Ms. Gurkamal Hora Arora. The Tribunal appointed the IRP to oversee the resolution process, directing compliance with relevant sections of the Code.

7. Communication and Record-Keeping:
The Tribunal ensured communication of the order to all relevant parties, including the Applicant, Corporate Debtor, and the appointed IRP. Additionally, a copy of the order was forwarded to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) for record-keeping.

In conclusion, the Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency against the Respondent, imposing a moratorium and appointing an IRP to facilitate the resolution process effectively.

---