Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction of interest relating to earlier years raised any question of law warranting a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Tribunal's conclusion turned on the factual determination that, although liability to pay interest arose on default, the assessee could not have discovered the default earlier because the compromise decree permitted satisfaction of the decree either by cash instalments or by adjustment against future supplies of motor vehicles. On the evidence, the Tribunal accepted that the assessee became aware of the default only when execution proceedings were initiated, and that the interest provision made in the relevant year was justified on those facts. Such a finding involved appreciation of facts rather than a debatable legal issue.
Conclusion: No question of law arose from the Tribunal's order, and the Revenue's prayer for reference was rightly rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal's decision on allowability of a deduction rests on a pure finding of fact regarding accrual and discovery of liability, no referable question of law arises under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.