Inadequate appellate reasoning led to remand for fresh consideration of the statutory appeal on merits.

A sketchy and cryptic tribunal order that failed to address the relevant factual and legal issues in a statutory appeal was found inadequate for effective adjudication. The Supreme Court declined to examine the merits and set aside the impugned judgment, remanding the matter to the Appellate Authority for fresh consideration of the appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law. The ruling underscores that appellate decisions must deal with the material aspects necessary for determination, and where they do not, a remand for reconsideration is appropriate.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order, being sketchy and cryptic, should be set aside and the appeals relegated to the Appellate Authority for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The order under challenge did not deal with the factual and legal aspects required for decision of the statutory appeal. The Court refrained from examining the merits and considered it appropriate to send the parties back to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration of the appeal afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The impugned judgment and order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by the Appellate Authority.

---