Tribunal remits case to CIT(A) for fresh order, considering second remand report and appellant's rejoinder. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh order, instructing consideration of both the second remand report and the appellant's ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal remits case to CIT(A) for fresh order, considering second remand report and appellant's rejoinder.
The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh order, instructing consideration of both the second remand report and the appellant's rejoinder. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of the CIT(A) reconsidering the case in light of the second remand report and the appellant's submissions.
Issues: Appeal against order of CIT(A) regarding non-provision of second remand report to assessee.
In this case, the assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) regarding the non-provision of the second remand report. The appellant argued that despite specific requests made to the CIT(A), the second remand report was not provided. The appellant's representative highlighted that the Assessing Officer had submitted the first remand report, and subsequently, the CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to submit a second remand report. The appellant provided comprehensive replies to the questionnaire during the remand report process. However, the CIT(A) passed the order without providing a copy of the second remand report to the assessee, despite repeated requests. The appellant even approached the Principal CIT for intervention, but no action was taken. The appellant requested that the order of the CIT(A) be set aside, and directions be given to provide the second remand report for proper confrontation.
The Departmental Representative contended that the remand report had already been provided to the assessee. After hearing both parties and examining the record, the Tribunal noted that the first remand report was issued by the Assessing Officer, followed by directions from the CIT(A) for a second remand report. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) must have instructed the Assessing Officer to file the second remand report, as evidenced by the subsequent correspondence. Despite the appellant's comprehensive responses to the Assessing Officer's queries, the CIT(A) did not provide a copy of the second remand report to the assessee, despite multiple requests and even an appeal to the Principal CIT. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to remit the issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh order, instructing the CIT(A) to consider both the second remand report and the appellant's rejoinder to the remand report.
Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for the CIT(A) to reconsider the case in light of the second remand report and the appellant's submissions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.