High Court directs Tribunal to assess value of goods for tax purposes, reducing unexplained investment. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh directed the Appellate Tribunal to frame a question on the value of goods covered by a bank loan, reducing unexplained ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court directs Tribunal to assess value of goods for tax purposes, reducing unexplained investment.
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh directed the Appellate Tribunal to frame a question on the value of goods covered by a bank loan, reducing unexplained investment to 30% of the stocks' value in response to an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh delivered a judgment in response to an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court framed a question regarding the evidence before the Appellate Tribunal on the value of goods covered by a bank loan, reducing unexplained investment to 30% of the stocks' value. The court directed the Tribunal to state the case for answer.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.