Church entitled to claim depreciation for building as activities qualify as vocation The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for the church building while computing income. The court held ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Church entitled to claim depreciation for building as activities qualify as vocation
The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for the church building while computing income. The court held that the church's activities, such as delivering sermons and preaching the Bible, qualified as a vocation under the definition of "profession." Therefore, the church was entitled to claim depreciation for its building, rejecting the Department's argument that a church itself does not run a business.
Issues involved: Whether depreciation is allowable for a church while computing income under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession."
Summary: The High Court of Karnataka addressed the issue of whether a church is entitled to claim depreciation for its building while computing income. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal initially disallowed the depreciation claim, stating that the church did not carry on any business or activity for profit. However, the Appellate Authority reversed this decision, noting that the church engaged in various activities and received donations and offerings, thus qualifying as a vocation. The Department appealed to the Tribunal, which held that a church itself is not running a business and therefore denied the depreciation claim.
In the High Court, the counsel for the assessee argued that the church, through its activities like delivering sermons and preaching Bible, is engaged in a vocation. The court agreed with this argument, citing the definition of "profession" to include vocation and referring to a Supreme Court decision where teaching Vedanta was considered a vocation. The court concluded that the activities of the church should be considered a vocation, entitling the assessee to claim depreciation for the church building while computing taxable income.
Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for the church building and answering the question in the negative. No costs were awarded in this case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.