<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 60 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28436</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for the church building while computing income. The court held that the church&#039;s activities, such as delivering sermons and preaching the Bible, qualified as a vocation under the definition of &quot;profession.&quot; Therefore, the church was entitled to claim depreciation for its building, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument that a church itself does not run a business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 60 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28436</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for the church building while computing income. The court held that the church&#039;s activities, such as delivering sermons and preaching the Bible, qualified as a vocation under the definition of &quot;profession.&quot; Therefore, the church was entitled to claim depreciation for its building, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument that a church itself does not run a business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>