TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows depreciation on trust assets, permits carry forward of excess expenditure</h1> <h3>The Deputy Director of Income Tax (E), Circle 17 (1), Bangalore Versus Jyothy Charitable Trust</h3> The Deputy Director of Income Tax (E), Circle 17 (1), Bangalore Versus Jyothy Charitable Trust - TMI Issues:1. Allowance of depreciation on assets claimed as capital expenditure towards charitable trust's objects.2. Entitlement of a trust to carry forward excess expenditure for setting off against income of succeeding years.Issue 1: Allowance of Depreciation on Assets Claimed as Capital Expenditure:The appeal involved a charitable trust claiming depreciation on assets where the cost had been claimed as capital expenditure towards the trust's objects. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the claim citing a potential double deduction issue based on a Supreme Court decision. The trust argued that previous High Court decisions supported allowing depreciation on such assets. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) allowed the depreciation claim, referencing similar decisions. The Tribunal, in a previous case, emphasized that depreciation is essential for computing income of charitable institutions to maintain the trust's corpus. The Tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court decision and supported allowing depreciation on capital assets for charitable trusts. The legal position was later amended prospectively by the Finance Act, 2014, reinforcing the allowance of depreciation on such assets.Issue 2: Entitlement of Trust to Carry Forward Excess Expenditure:The second issue revolved around whether a trust could carry forward excess expenditure to set off against income in subsequent years. The Assessing Officer denied this claim, asserting no provision allowed such carry forward. However, the CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the claim, citing precedents. The Tribunal examined the law, highlighting that adjusting excess expenditure against income of later years constitutes application of income for charitable purposes. Various High Court decisions supported this view, emphasizing the benevolent nature of provisions for charitable trusts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the trust's entitlement to carry forward and set off excess expenditure against future income.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of allowing depreciation on assets claimed as capital expenditure by a charitable trust and the entitlement of a trust to carry forward excess expenditure for setting off against future income. The Tribunal's detailed analysis upheld the trust's claims in both instances, emphasizing the legal principles and precedents supporting such allowances.
TaxTMI 