Revenue's Appeal Dismissed for Filing Against DRP, Assessee's Appeals Dismissed as Academic

The Tribunal found the revenue's appeal to be not maintainable as it was filed against the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) instead of the assessment order. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was dismissed. Subsequently, the assessee's appeals and cross objections were also dismissed as they were considered academic due to relief obtained through rectification.

---

---

Issues:
1. Maintainability of revenue's appeal against the directions of the DRP instead of the assessment order.
2. Consequences of the revenue's appeal being dismissed on the appeals and cross objections filed by the assessee.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Maintainability of Revenue's Appeal
The cross appeals were filed by the assessee and the revenue relating to the assessment year 2010-11. The contention arose regarding the maintainability of the revenue's appeal as it was filed against the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) rather than the assessment order passed after the DRP's directions. The counsel for the assessee argued that the appeal should have been against the assessment order, not the DRP's directions. It was highlighted that only the assessment order passed consequent to the DRP's directions is appealable before the Tribunal, as per the provisions of section 253(1)(d). The DRP had issued directions, which were rectified later, leading to the final assessment order. The Tribunal observed that the revenue's appeal was not maintainable as it was not filed against an appealable order, and thus, dismissed it.

Issue 2: Consequences on Assessee's Appeals
Following the dismissal of the revenue's appeal, the counsel for the assessee stated that their appeal and cross objections had become academic as relief was already obtained through rectification. In light of this, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and cross objections of the assessee as being infructuous and academic. Consequently, all the appeals of the revenue and the assessee, along with the cross objections by the assessee, were dismissed by the Tribunal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled that the revenue's appeal was not maintainable as it was not filed against an appealable order, leading to its dismissal. Subsequently, the assessee's appeals and cross objections were also dismissed as they were deemed academic following the relief obtained through rectification.

---