Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed on the authorised signatory of the manufacturing unit was sustainable after the demand and penalty against the main assessee had been set aside.
Analysis: The demand against the main assessee had already been dropped and the penalty imposed on it had also been set aside by the lower appellate authority. In that situation, there was no justification for continuing the penalty on the employee who was only the production incharge and authorised signatory of the unit. The absence of any surviving liability against the principal noticee removed the basis for penal action against the appellant.
Conclusion: The penalty on the authorised signatory was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.