Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant belonged to the Scheduled Caste of Beda Jangamma or Budaga Jangamma and was therefore entitled to contest the election as a Scheduled Caste candidate.
Analysis: The constitutional scheme under Article 341 makes the Presidential Notification conclusive, subject only to amendment under clause (2). Once the High Court found on evidence that the appellant belonged to Veerashiva Lingayath Jangamma and not to Beda Jangamma or Budaga Jangamma, the courts could not treat a synonymous or claimed equivalent caste description as sufficient to confer Scheduled Caste status. The civil court decision relied upon by the appellant was based on different evidence and circumstances, was not a judgment in rem, and did not bind the High Court. The certificate issued by the Assistant Municipal Commissioner also could not establish caste status, as the issuing authority lacked jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The appellant was not shown to belong to the Scheduled Caste notified as Beda Jangamma or Budaga Jangamma and was not entitled to contest as a Scheduled Caste candidate.
Ratio Decidendi: Caste status for Scheduled Caste entitlement must conform to the Presidential Notification under Article 341 and cannot be established by synonym, private assertion, or a certificate issued without jurisdiction.