<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 522 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282805</link>
    <description>Under Article 341, Scheduled Caste status must conform strictly to the Presidential Notification, which is conclusive except for amendment under clause (2). The Court held that evidence showing the appellant belonged to Veerashiva Lingayath Jangamma, rather than Beda Jangamma or Budaga Jangamma, was ative, and a claimed synonymous caste description could not confer Scheduled Caste status. A civil court decision based on different facts was not binding, and a caste certificate issued by an authority lacking jurisdiction could not establish entitlement. The appellant was therefore not entitled to contest the election as a Scheduled Caste candidate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 522 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282805</link>
      <description>Under Article 341, Scheduled Caste status must conform strictly to the Presidential Notification, which is conclusive except for amendment under clause (2). The Court held that evidence showing the appellant belonged to Veerashiva Lingayath Jangamma, rather than Beda Jangamma or Budaga Jangamma, was ative, and a claimed synonymous caste description could not confer Scheduled Caste status. A civil court decision based on different facts was not binding, and a caste certificate issued by an authority lacking jurisdiction could not establish entitlement. The appellant was therefore not entitled to contest the election as a Scheduled Caste candidate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>