Fair hearing in medical college approval matters led to confirmation of conditional permission and restraint on bank guarantee encashment.
A fresh consideration under Section 10A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act required the Central Government to reassess the record in a reasoned and dispassionate manner after hearing the medical college and considering the views of the relevant expert bodies. The impugned order was found unsatisfactory because it focused narrowly on later non-cooperation and earlier deficiencies without properly reappraising all material, including the college's representations and committee observations. The conditional letter of permission for the academic year 2016-17 was confirmed and encashment of the bank guarantee was restrained, but permission to admit students for 2017-18 was declined.
Issues: Whether the Central Government's order debarring the medical college from admissions and authorising encashment of the bank guarantee could be sustained when the matter had earlier been remitted for fresh consideration under Section 10A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and whether the conditional letter of permission granted for the academic year 2016-17 ought to be confirmed.
Analysis: The earlier remand required a fresh, reasoned consideration of the materials on record, including the views of the Medical Council of India, the Hearing Committee, the Director General of Health Services and the Oversight Committee, after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The impugned decision was found to have focused narrowly on the alleged non-cooperation in the later inspection and on the purported deficiencies noticed in the earlier inspection, without a proper reappraisal of all relevant materials, including the college's representations and the observations of the Oversight Committee and the Director General of Health Services. In view of the statutory requirement of fair hearing and the need for a dispassionate assessment before disapproval of a medical college scheme, the decision-making process was held to be unsatisfactory.
Conclusion: The conditional letter of permission was directed to be confirmed, the encashment of the bank guarantee was restrained, and the impugned order was modified to that extent, though permission to admit students for the academic year 2017-18 was declined.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
