TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court directs registration of petitioner-association under Income Tax Act despite benefiting specific class.</h1> <h3>Gujarat State Plastic Manufacturers Association Versus Commissioner of Income Tax.</h3> Gujarat State Plastic Manufacturers Association Versus Commissioner of Income Tax. - TMI Issues involved: The issues involved in this case include the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration under section 12-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the CIT, Gujarat-III, Ahmedabad, based on various grounds such as the date of creation of the association, delay in filing Form No. 10A, absence of a registration certificate from the charity commissioner, and the nature of the association's objectives.Summary:Issue 1 - Date of Creation of Association: The petitioner argued that the exact date of creation of the association was not known and was not relevant for the registration process. The respondent's rejection on this ground was deemed invalid as the application should have been decided on its merits.Issue 2 - Delay in Filing Application: The petitioner contended that any delay in filing the application should not have been a reason for rejection, especially since the application was submitted in 1988 and no action was taken for several years. The rejection based on delay was considered unjustified.Issue 3 - Submission of Charity Commissioner's Certificate: The petitioner clarified that since they were not a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, the requirement to submit a registration certificate from the Charity Commissioner was irrelevant. The rejection on this ground was deemed misconceived.Issue 4 - Nature of Association's Objectives: The respondent rejected the application stating that the association's objectives were aimed at benefiting traders in a specific trade, making it more of a trade association than a charitable institution. The petitioner argued that the objectives were for the general public benefit, citing relevant case law.Conclusion: The High Court held that the respondent erred in rejecting the application under section 12-A of the Act. The Court referred to Supreme Court decisions emphasizing that activities benefiting a specific class can still be considered charitable. The Court directed the respondent to grant registration to the petitioner-association with effect from the financial year 1991-92, based on the amended proviso to section 12-A(a).
TaxTMI 